MHLoppy
Currently studying CS and some other stuff. Best known for previously being top 50 (OCE) in LoL, expert RoN modder, and creator of RoN:EE’s community patch (CBP). He/him.
(header photo by Brian Maffitt)
- 62 Posts
- 6 Comments
I guess perspective here depends on your anchoring point. I’m anchoring mostly on the existing platform (YouTube), and Nebula’s policy here looks better (subjectively much better) than what runs as normal in big tech. If your anchor is your local PeerTube instance with a privacy policy that wasn’t written by lawyers, I can see how you’d not be a fan.
However beyond being in legalese I’m not sure what part of it you find so bad as to describe it as a shithole. Even compared to e.g., lemmy.world’s privacy policy Nebula’s looks “good enough” to me. They collect slightly more device information than I wish they did and are more open to having/using advertising partners than I had expected (from what I know of the service as someone who has never actually used it) but that’s like… pretty tame compared what most of the big platforms have.
Nebula is a shithole, just have a glance at their privacy policy.
It looks pretty run of the mill to me?
MHLoppy@fedia.ioto The Onion and other satire w/ layers@sh.itjust.works•Shitty Cloud Doesn’t Even Look Like an Animal or Nothing2·3 days ago“Unfortunately, climate change is accelerating the shittification of clouds.
Is nothing sacred
Can access fine (with reduced functionality) on my end with JS disabled - maybe you have something else tripping it up or something?
MHLoppy@fedia.ioto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Your Lemmy/Reddit/Fetlife/etc profile is tied to your real name and browsable. How screwed are you?6·13 days agoI used to believe in this (and to a degree still do), but the idea of increasing the attack surface of unreasonable people (who seem to have become increasingly common in the last 10 years) who will do insane things like SWAT you, or doxx your personal details (like home address), or even just follow you around online to harass you has made me have second thoughts about the tradeoffs involved in this approach 🫠
That’s a rather pessimistic interpretation of a privacy policy that starts with this:
and which in section 10 (Notice for Nevada Residents) says:
So yes, I suppose they may be selling personal information by some other definition (I don’t know the Nevada law in question). But it feels extremely aggressive to label it a “shithole” that “collect[s] as much data about you as we can to sell to advertisers” based on the text of the privacy policy as provided.