• 6 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • Thirty-ish years ago, my grandfather said he felt sorry for me because of the state of the world.

    Human nature is to say things are going to shit, everything is terrible, and things were better in some non-existent past.

    Yeah, things suck now. But they also sucked thirty years ago and 100 years ago. The difference is that we know the outcome to (some) of the problems people faced then. And (generally) the worst case scenario didn’t happen.

    Yeah, we need to fight the rich on climate change. But we will. And we’ll mitigate the problems we can. And we’ll tell our grandkids that we don’t envy their future.






  • They weren’t exactly harsh in their criticism of Trump’s original threats:

    there has been no direct public condemnation by allied leaders and it seems — in the face of Trump — we find ourselves alone.

    Beyond the keep calm and carry on approach of NATO allies, there has been a deafening silence from the Commonwealth, in particular the United Kingdom, a country with which we share deep historical, social and institutional ties.


  • sbv@sh.itjust.workstoCanada@lemmy.caTrump learning the Netanyahu strat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    an assault on Canada is very unpopular with US citizens and troops and all of the states that border Canada will refuse to turn into battlegrounds

    That puts a lot of faith in the US population to (a) care, and (b) act on it.

    I suspect any invasion would be structured as a rescue of some victimized population (Albertan separatists? Teens receiving gender affirming care? Anglos in Quebec?), and would yoink something of value (water? oil?) so it wouldn’t be a broad based invasion.

    If any countries came to Canada’s aid with their own military force then it would get even uglier.

    The US remains the world’s largest economy and biggest military spender.

    I’m sure there would be a strongly worded proclamation from the UN General Assembly, and NATO would perform some mental gymnastics to avoid article 5.







  • This is good shit:

    Ortega is poised to receive a record dividend of €3.1bn (£2.7bn) this year from his shares in Zara’s parent group, Inditex. He is reportedly racing to spend the windfall, which would otherwise be subject to wealth taxes. Sources close to Pontegadea told the Guardian it was not investing to avoid tax, but following its mandate “to create wealth from the original assets, maintain it, make it grow, and consolidate it over generations”.

    What is clear is that, two years on, a predicted exodus of the rich, trumpeted in endless alarmist headlines, has not materialised. Forbes counted 26 Spanish billionaires in 2021. This year, it lists 34, with a combined net worth comfortably over $200bn.

    So far, there is no sign that it has affected growth. Spain was the world’s fastest-expanding major advanced economy last year, outpacing even the US, with GDP up 3.2%. By contrast, growth in the UK and France last year barely scraped above 1%. On the balconies of the Planeta building, and in the country at large, the green shoots are alive and well.




  • Despite the persistence of the myth that rent controls kill supply, evidence demonstrates the contrary. In 2020, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) analyzed the impact of rental controls enacted after 1971. The key finding of this study: “There was no significant evidence that rental starts were lower in rent control markets than in no rent control markets.” Recognizing that current debates on rent controls resemble long discredited arguments against minimum wage increases, 32 U.S. economists signed a letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency concluding that “there is substantial evidence that rent regulation policies do not limit new construction, nor the overall supply of housing.”








  • It would be fantastic if our other GHG-producing activities were held to the same level of criticism as AI.

    You’re gonna get downvotes defending AI on Lemmy - our Overton window is *tiny*.

    A ChatGPT prompt uses 3 Wh. This is enough energy to:

    Leave a single incandescent light bulb on for 3 minutes.

    Leave a wireless router on for 30 minutes.

    Play a gaming console for 1 minute.

    Run a vacuum cleaner for 10 seconds.

    Run a microwave for 10 seconds

    Run a toaster for 8 seconds

    Brew coffee for 10 seconds

    Use a laptop for 3 minutes. ChatGPT could write this post using less energy than your laptop uses over the time you read it.