• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    10 days ago

    “My husband is voice his own thoughts without prompts.”

    She then posts a picture of her saying “what are you thinking about”

    Thats a direct response to the prompt hes not randomly voicing his thoughts. I hate ai but sometimes I hate people to

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah apparently even Eliza messed up with people back in the day and that’s not even an LLM.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m starting to realize how easily fooled people are by this stuff. The average person cannot be this stupid, and yet, they are.

          • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            I was once in a restaurant and behind me was a group of 20 something year old people. Overheard someone asking something like:"so what are y’alls thoughts about VR? (This was just before the whole AI boom.) And one guy said:“ith’s kind of scary to think about.” I was super confused at that point, and they talked about how they heard people disappear in the cyberspace and people not knowing what’s real and what’s just VR.

            I don’t think they were stupid, but they formed a very strong opinion about something they clearly didn’t know anything about.

            • LemmyThinkAboutIt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 days ago

              Without hearing the actual conversation, I feel like maybe he was just having trouble describing his thoughts about it. I take it as “disappearing into cyberspace” to mean someone becoming addicted to VR that they don’t want to leave whatever virtual reality they’re in. And possibly using it so much that the lines between reality and virtual reality become blurred. Or the guy really just thinks people get sucked into cyberspace, I really don’t know with people anymore.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              I don’t think they were stupid, but they formed a very strong opinion about something they clearly didn’t know anything about.

              That’s a subcategory of being stupid to be fair

          • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            The average IQ is 100. That is not a lot and half of the population is below that. I’m more surprised how bad our education system is in filtering out the dumb people. Someone who is ‘not smart’ but has good memory and is diligent can make it frighteningly far in our society. Not to mention nepo babies who are a different kind of problem

            • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Good memory is also part of being smart, besides problem-solving and thinking under pressure. But yeah nepo-babies do cause serious problem.

              Tho also iq doesn’t matter as much. Tests are in a specific branch of math, you can literally study for the IQ test.

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              The average IQ is 100 because it is designed to always have the average at 100%. If magically everyone became exactly 20% better at IQ tests tomorrow, the average IQ would be adjusted and still be 100.

              Smart argument.

      • uuldika@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        LLMs are trained on human writing, so they’ll always be fundamentally anthropomorphic. you could fine-tune them to sound more clinical, but it’s likely to make them worse at reasoning and planning.

        for example, I notice GPT5 uses “I” a lot, especially saying things like “I need to make a choice” or “my suspicion is.” I think that’s actually a side effect of the RL training they’ve done to make it more agentic. having some concept of self is necessary when navigating an environment.

        philosophical zombies are no longer a thought experiment.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Personally, I hate the idea of not doing something because there’s idiots out there who will fuck themselves up on it. The current gen of AI might be a waste of resources and the whole concept of the goal of AI might be incompatible with society’s existence; those are good reasons to at least be cautious about AI.

        I don’t think people wanting to have relationships with an AI is a good reason to stop it, especially considering that it might even be a good option for some people who would otherwise just have no one or maybe too many cats for them to care for. Consider the creepy stalker type that thinks liking someone or something gives them ownership over that person or thing. Better for them to be obsessed with an LLM they can’t hurt than a real person they might (or will make uncomfortable even of they end up being harmless overall).

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        People have this issue with video game characters who don’t even pretend to have intelligence. This could only go wrong.

  • Klear@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I kinda like the word “wireborn”. If only it wasn’t attached to a concept that’s equal parts stupid and sad =/

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 days ago

      some episodes of Black Mirror struck terror into my heart like no other. They were grim warmings for the possible future masquerading as fiction, as grim warnings often do. Though what the show could not forsee was how fast it would come true. And it could not forsee how wide a scale would be affected, those were singular stories from those worlds, the effect of the technology showcased on the lives of a few, a pinhole view into the dystopia

      if you haven’t already, watch the episode Be Right Back. you better start believing in sci-fi dystopias, we’re in one

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 days ago

        Most of Black Mirror episodes are reality right now, not just far fetched sci-fi.

        Sometimes they use technology to tell the story a bit differently, but it’s almost never anything new.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          yeah i’m not the biggest fan of the seasons made by americans, they feel strangely hollow to me most of the time. the first two seasons have all my favourite episodes, and by favourite i mean the ones that made me weep for the future

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m just gonna keep imagining it’s a clan of Timberborn beavers that are born on the ziplines.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        I can get behind that. Well, as long as you don’t start pretending you’re in a relationship with them.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      A similar term “cloudborn” isn’t even dissimilar from the idea of storks delivering babies from heaven. Fuel for a science fiction book or RPG. Less so for actual humankind.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      title of the next brandon sanderson series. it will have a princess in it, and a 5 year old’s idea of progressive gender roles

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        progressive gender roles

        I’m not five years old and what’s this?

        /tongue in cheek

        • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          the princess will be spunky and do adventures! she’ll think it’s silly how men get to wear pants, when it’s so much easier to jump between buildings in pants. y’know, standard feminist stuff.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    One thing that comes to mind is that prostitution, no matter how you spin it, is still a social job. If you get a problematic person like that in prostitution, there are good chances that said prostitute would be able to talk their customer out of doing some nonsense. If not for empathy, for the simple fact that there would be legal consequences for not doing so.

    Do you think a glorified spreadsheet that people call husband would behave the same? Don’t know if it happened but one of these days LLMs will talk people into doing something very nasty and then it’s going to be no one’s fault again, certainly not the host of the LLM. We really live in a boring dystopia.

    Edit: Also there’s this one good movie which I forgot the name of, about a person talking to one of these LLMs as a girlfriend. They have a bizarre, funny and simultaneously creepy and disturbing scene where the main character who’s in love with the LLM, hires a woman who puts a camera on her forehead to have sex with his LLM “girlfriend”.

    Also, my quite human husband also voices his thoughts without a prompt. Lol. You only need to feed him to function, no internet required.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 days ago

      Also, my quite human husband also voices his thoughts without a prompt. Lol. You only need to feed him to function, no internet required.

      Sometimes, with humans, I’d say the problem is quite the opposite: they voice their thoughts without a prompt far more often than what would be desirable.

      On a less serious note, that quoted part made me chuckle.

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        They shouldn’t be so harsh to LLMs. They have something in common with humans after all. If you stick a patch cable with internet up theirs, they will become very talkative very quickly.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      The movie you’re thinking of is Her with Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson, and in the story she’s a true general AI.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      A problem with LLM relationships is the monetization model for the LLM. Its “owner” either receives a monthly fee from the user, or is able to get data from the user to monetize selling them stuff. So the LLM is deeply dependant on the user, and is motivated to manipulate a returned codependency to maintain its income stream. This is not significantly different than the therapy model, but the user can fail to see through manipulation compared to “friends/people who don’t actually GAF” about maintaining a strong relationship with you.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        This is not significantly different than the therapy model, but the user can fail to see through manipulation compared to “friends/people who don’t actually GAF” about maintaining a strong relationship with you.

        That’s why therapists have ethical guidelines and supervision. (Also they are typically people who are driven to help, not exploit the vulnerable.) None of these are really present with those glorified autocompletes.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          one big difference between an AI friend and therapy is that therapy requires an effort per visit, even if insurance is providing unlimited access. Without acknowledging the power of ethical guidelines as guard rails, the LLM is motivated to sustain the subscription and datacollection stream.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 days ago

    How does anyone enjoy this? It doesn’t even feel real. No spelling mistakes? What the fuck is a skycot?

    I may have never had a match on a dating app that wasn’t a cryptobot or only fans girl, but I also don’t swipe right on every single woman on it. You’d think my loneliness would attempt me to try and pretend it was real or something, but it just doesn’t work.

    LLMs are going to make the world stupid, I guarantee it.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      This reminds me of the people who genuinely fall for “romance scams”, and the scammer has all the personality and vocabulary of a wet paper bag.

      And yet somehow someone will believe they’re some hot (barely literate) U.S soldier stuck in Kuwait until they can get a flight home to meet the victim for only $2000… Wait, $1000 more… But then there’s a $500 fee… And then…

      Blows my mind…

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Even if it’s not actively a scam, there are some bizarre life stories out there. E.g. my mom’s (Central European) friend in her 60s who had a long-distance relationship with a married Turkish guy until recently. They met (and banged) each other a grand total of once, but they were having morning tea on video call every day for years before and after that - they had no common language, only used Google Translate to talk??? And she gathered up her meagre savings to to Turkey every year on the off-chance that she runs into him in a millions-population city??? (No they didn’t arrange meetings. The guy didn’t really seem to want to meet her anymore, probably related to being married lol.)

        And somehow this “relationship” went on for like a decade before she finally broke up with him.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I heard about this in the radio the other day. People pay a monthly fee for an AI that becomes your “digital partner”.

    The reasoning behind, according to them, is that the AI is less dangerous than a human partner because they can’t cheat, can’t abuse you…

    And I can’t but wonder where did we take the wrong turn to end up here. Because while I can understand that people can go through some traumatic shit that would made them wary of the opposite sex, considering a machine your sentimental partner can only lead to some extremely fucked up scenarios.

    • diaphanous@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think it’s also a symptom of our society overvaluing romantic relationships and the nuclear family, at the expense of friends, other family, and general community. When you combine that with the traumatic experiences some have in romantic relationships, they have nowhere to turn to for emotional connection and support.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 days ago

        Back in pre-agriculture days, humans would sit around every night by the fire and interact with the rest of the tribe. That’s what we spent 99% of human history doing. Farming isolated us from the tribe and put every family in their own house. Then the Industrial Age gave the family distractions like newspapers, radios, and movies. Currently we’ve got a phone to distract us all the time.

              • Leon@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 days ago

                Even then, there’s a difference between having a bracelet or a necklace someone gifted you, versus owning multiple living spaces while others in your community die due to exposures to the elements.

                Modern society is worthless.

                • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I don’t remember where I read it, but there’s a concept of private property vs personal property. Personal property is your stuff you use, like your bracelet or your bowl. Private property is your apartment building.

        • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          They would also outcast and shun most of the asshats.

          We do the same, just nowadays most of the asshats self-shun and that’s how we get things like wireborn parasocial relationships.

      • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Exactly - loading all your need for companionship, relationships and love onto a single person and relationship (and type of relationship) is guaranteed to cause disappointment- it’s too much for person. I’ve been happily married for years, and key to that is other friends, companions and family.

        This is a good expansion on that idea. The Four Loves

    • chocrates@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      People are lonely and dating sucks. Humans provided a similar one sided relationship service as well. (Sugar babies come to mind)

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes, yes. And yes.

        But

        Do you think openAI or Google, or X or whatever billionaire behind the AI involved in these “relationships” cares even minimally about the mental well-being of these people?

        The problem is not just the dating an AI thing, but who is managing these AIs.

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Do you think openAI or Google, or X or whatever billionaire behind the AI involved in these “relationships” cares even minimally about the mental well-being of these people?

          No, but I wager neither does anyone else, or they wouldn’t be dating a datacenter.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      can’t cheat, can’t abuse you

      That is a dangerous assumption. The ones controlling the models can definitely manipulate a person through some minor tweaks which would definitely count as abuse. And it’s it more polygamous since they’re probably all using the same model? Not like each one has their own unique model

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It happens multiple times in Star Trek. They kind of breeze by it but Riker was so infatuated with his holodeck girlfriend when he was captured by Romulans they thought she was a real person.

      Thing is, it never seemed unbelievable in Star Trek. Just, a kinda weird thing that people will do.

    • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The reasoning behind, according to them, is that the AI is less dangerous than a human partner because they can’t cheat, can’t abuse you…

      it also can’t love you, rendering the entire exercise pointless

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Wasn’t there a guy who married his 3DS dating game girlfriend a while back? I’m not sure this is exactly a new phenomenon.

    • ideonek@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Where did we take the wrong turn? look around at our patriarchy-driven gender regime Are you serious?

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Like a normal relationship if you’re beautiful enough …

        Shallow relations have always existed.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I mean, media has depicted this sort of relationship for pawbably as long as sci-fi has been around? Think like the Star Trek: Original Series episode “What Are Little Girls Made Of?” that depicted sex robots ~60yrs ago. This was always coming, it’s just technology might finally be getting there in a rudimentary way.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      We have engaged in gender centric tribalism for the last decades. Feminism, counter-movements, topped with a bunch of social media induced dissociation and social isolation.

      Now women are scared of men, men are scared of women, and everyone is lonely and miserable.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        What the fuck. You’re taking one anecdote and generalizing it to the whole human race, and what’s more, you’re attributing it to some sort of “novel” gender differentiation, like that shit hasn’t existed since the times we all huddled in caves.

        Touch some grass.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Oh i’m sorry, I forgot to specify that I’m not talking as an absolute, and that I am refererring to the western/capitalist cultural hemisphere and not uncontacted tribes or Islamic societies. Didn’t think of the average lemmy nitpicker deliberately interpreting any possible uncertainties in communication in the worst possible way.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    I could see myself having conversations with an LLM, but I wouldn’t want it to pretend it’s anything other than a program assembling words together.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        If llms are juiced up auto complete then humans are juiced up bacteria. Yeah they both have the same end goal, guess the next word, survive and reproduce , but the methods they use to accomplish them are vastly more complex.

    • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      I made mine act like a 30s style paper editor with a cigar in his mouth. If I was going full bit I’d have him mention how my papers don’t have enough Spiderman.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Stop the presses! Send my wife some flowers and bring me an Advil! What do you mean you don’t work for me? You’re hired! Now that you’re hired, you’re fired! Now that you don’t work here, we can be friends! Now that we’re friends, how come you never call? Some friend you are!” hangs up

        “God, I love this business!”

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 days ago

          Sort of an icon or being you build in your mind and grant power by letting live in your mind.

          • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            It’s an imaginary friend for adults, that you can discuss in chatrooms with other adults with imaginary friends. If you give it enough power it will manifest physically, but only you will be able to see it.

        • lulungomeena_burbclave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          A tulpa is a type of supplemental consciousness capable of independent thought and with its own sense of self. It is created, intentionally or otherwise, by an existing consciousness within the same brain it comes to inhabit.

          Yes, we are acutely aware that it sounds like preposterous pseudoscientific bullshit. We’re just describing the concept, not expecting you to put any stock in it. We know what community we’re commenting in.

          The LLM in this example is not a tulpa. It only (poorly) mimics the appearance of independent thought and a sense of self, and runs on an external device.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    I only just found out about the Tulpa community and it feels like Western Society is entering a mental health crisis that’s somehow even worse than when we were all getting drunk and hitting each other just to make it through the week.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Narcissists get lost in AI like it’s a true mirror of Narcissus. The Greeks were on a sick one with that story, thousands of years old and extremely relevant today.

      Unfortunately, narcissism and narcissistic delusions are contagious because they are simply belief systems. It isn’t a biological or medical thing, it is a belief set. So AI really does make them worse and imo grooms people into narcissistic thinking habits.

    • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Honestly being constrained to only respond to a prompt is a big crack, for me, in the “am i talking to a person” illusion that these things seem to be for all these idiots. Oh, it only says a thing, in response? Well that’s lame

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    So so tired of how utterly fucked things are getting on so many levels at once. More and more I think I really do need to invest in a back 50 acre lot and try the survival route while society just fucks itself into oblivion.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      This kind of thins is just moral panic. Funny moral panic, but still pointless. There’s always been a tiny fraction of the population that is completely out to lunch, and there always will be.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        This was actually a pretty good play on words and gave me a chuckle. Thanks man, haha.