INFO!!! fairphone DOES SUPPORT CUSTOM ROMS!!!

i like the idea of a fairphone. i dun wana buy one tho - if it doesn hav the features i need/wan.

if fairphone had all dis stuff - it would hav a genuine moat, besides the sustainability stff-

alternative image link (blahaj zone)

    • passepartout@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I couldn’t find the part where it says that but that’s what I thought. Pin code throttling is part of AOSP iirc, so they would have to go out of their way to remove it (or base their OS on an older LineageOS release like /e/os).

      Edit: It’s not. It’s about the missing chip. Read the comment.

      • lemmysmash@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        PIN code throttling can’t be implemented properly if hardware doesn’t support it. This is the very purpose of the secure element.

        It has its own CPU, storage, random number generator and realtime clock. Once a secret (encryption key) is generated inside of it, it can’t get unlocked until this very tiny chip allows it. And the chip uses different kind of protections (in case of weak pins — the most prominent one is throttling using its built-in RTC clock).

        If there’s no secure element, then attacker can just extract the memory chip and easily brute force the encrypted key on the much more powerful (and not throttled by RTC) hardware.

        And since the PIN codes are so weak, even the strongest key derivation functions won’t help against such bruteforce.