• Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    I’m still angry that an (optionally) AI browser isn’t the worst idea as a headline/dev direction … if you don’t read any further than the headline that is.

    I do want or eventually will need some local, foss AI to deal with all the megacorp bs AI that will be just everywhere on the internets (I can’t humanly fight the increasing megacorp slop, I need/will need my own AI to help me fight and navigate it, as a freedom necessity).
    Someone pls work on that, I don’t want to live in an internetless cave/woods for the rest of my life (the cave/woods is what I wish for regardless, it’s just a question of my need for internet access).

    But no, they decided to hammer their dicks with all the megamatacorp AIs. I mean, it’s prob marginally better than to forward ppl to sites or Chrome, but it’s not a thing that you would want publicized as a major step/direction, it’s at the very least distasteful.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Yeah but its a soft fork, inherently dependent on mozilla.

      Mozilla is circling the drain, determined to drive away the last of its users.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Firefox is evolving into an agentic browser, connecting devices, cloud, and AI to unlock intelligent productivity and secure work anywhere. Join us at #MozillaIgnite to see how frontier firms are transforming with Firefox and what’s next for the platform. We can’t wait to show you!”

      • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        39 minutes ago

        Here’s a complementary can of gasoline and blowtorch. It would be a shame if something happened to spill the gasoline on me. And then light the blowtorch. A real shame.

  • Alphonsus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I suggest they should also bring back continuous scrolling, it makes browsing and reading easier there.

  • FourThirteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The image is nearly 10 months old!

    Anyone that is not using Libre Wolf or equivalent should be to take advantage of the wonderful privacy suite.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I know I’m gonna get a lot of flack for suggesting this, but Vivaldi feels like what Firefox should have been. More customizability, less AI and sponsored crap. They are the only major browser offering an option for a small, reasonably sized tab bar rather than the tab bars with 3 layers of padding and more whitespace than text.

    Additionally, Vivaldi doesn’t pester you with twice-a-day update pop-ups or worse, the dreaded “Restart to keep using Firefox,” it just gets out of your way like a good browser should.

    • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      On the other hand they literally built an email client into their web browser. I don’t think they’ve met scope creep they didn’t like.

      I think floorp and zen are trying to be the Vivaldi of Firefox but with less…stuff.

      • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Netscape 3 with integrated mail and news is still the best internet experience that’s ever been conceived or designed or implemented. Communicator screwed it all up less than a year later but it was the best while it lasted.

        • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 minutes ago

          Fast forward nearly 30 years and pretty much everyone uses webmail, so building a web-based client into your browser to poorly interact with an existing web-based service seems questionable.

          If I want something to do a shit job accessing Gmail’s shitty non-standard service, I can always let thunderbird do a shit job.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I tried it before, it was buggy and my tabs locked up. Also since its based on chrome, its very nerfed when it comes to powerful plugins. I didnt like it. My first impression was positive but no, it feels very bloated.

      But if you like it and you feel its better than Firefox for you, thats a good thing.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Is it chromium? If yes than pass. Did everyone forgot when Google tried to use chromium to take control with this bullshit?

    • Raffen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Vivaldi is by far the best browser out there. Its customizability and tab handling is second to none. Anyone not giving it a spin are missing out. Yes, their UI is proprietary, but out of all the things to be concerned about, this aint it. They are based in Norway and made by software engineers who worked on Opera browser who out of principle just wants a good browser which is not in corporate hell.

      Seriously give it a try.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 minutes ago

        I stopped using Opera more 15 years ago, shortly before they dropped their own engine.

        I did like their customisation options, 20+ years ago they were the only browser supporting mouse gestures too.

        But I see no reason why would I want to use what’s basically chromium, especially bcs of ad blocking.
        Y’all just live with ads? (I don’t think sinkholes catch everything.)

        Additionally I do not want to support proprietary code if I don’t have to.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        Vivaldi is by far the best browser out there

        Maybe among the wheelchair bound browsers that don’t let you properly block ads.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah I’m switch off Firefox finally. I tried Floorp it does have some the same AI stuff you have to turn off. Waterfox doesn’t have it in at all. So Waterfox it is.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        Honestly the way they (by default) change home tab background for each visit is absolutely adorable.

        All my 'puters have Water, Wolf, and Floo.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Floorp

      I don’t think I will ever be able to pass past this name. It’s a name of something that sci-fi comedic cartoon will create for a passing joke.

      • Xenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        I actually use floorp. It’s literally the most customizable Firefox fork. It’s the only Firefox fork that allows me to have my tab bar exactly correct the way I want it.

        But yeah name’s stupid. I kind of love it though. It’s so non-serious

        • Glifted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          I’m still not convinced that name isn’t an elaborate joke. Like I could download the browser and be typing this comment on it and still think “man, they went all-in on this prank”

      • Flagstaff@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Discord doesn’t like it when it comes to voice-chat in the Android app, sadly (even though I know we should all leave Discord, but Revolt and Matrix can barely hold candles to the flame of its incredibly sophisticated streaming system), but yes, I’ve been on Waterfox for some time now.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      There are a bunch of flags in about:config you can check as well, if you wanna be extra sure they’re turned off. Just search for browser.ml. There are more but this was all I could capture in one screenshot. Bold means I had to change it, which means it was on by default. That said I’m using CachyOS repos, not the direct Arch ones.

    • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Hold your click for at least one second on any link and it will show a preview of the link and suggest you to use AI to describe it

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Settings > scroll down to “General” > look at the options under “Enable link previews”. You can turn the previews off altogether or just turn off the AI part

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, you can also opt out of your planet being demolished to build the intergalactic highway, the form is in the basement.
          Incidentally, most of the new llm bullshits are on by default and can’t be turn off in the settings, you need to go to about:config and search for .ml to do so (not to be confused with .ml instance of lemmy which you also can’t easily opt out of). Obviously this settings aren’t synchronised between instances by “synchronise all settings” thingy which they need my personal info for, why would it, so you need to do it every time. Also also they sometimes revert back with major updates, because obviously they are.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          This is a defence only until it isn’t - although thank you for the tip.

          That’s how Windows has been going for years - adding more and more crap and make it all default enabled, and people are like “Oh just turn it off bro.”

          Then every update adds more unwanted options that get increasingly difficult to turn off, or randomly turn themselves back on, and before you know it we’ve reached a point where every new install soon needs an entire checklist to go through to make things actually usable again.

          That is not how life should be. I want something that respects me by default, and if it wants me to try a feature I might find even slightly objectional, I should have to explicitly opt-in and say YES.

          Firefox is setting a precedent by moving in this direction, and they’ve showed their hand. There’s only more where this came from, and I won’t tolerate it, even if I can turn it off.

          When the Firefox terms and conditions drama happened some months back, that was the push I needed to switch to Librewolf. It’s a Firefox fork with privacy-respecting settings out of the gate, no sponsored content, no ads, uBlock pre-installed, and absolutely zero AI. If you’re a Firefox user, I recommend you try it too.

        • dreamos82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          In my opinion this is one of the main issues. All those features should be disabled by default, and only the user decide if they want to enable them!

          But they are doing the opposite.

        • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Thanks I already did that, but it still ticks me off that I had to find out they added this while using the browser. This shit should be off by default.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        So it’s entirely optional, you only encounter it by interacting with the browser in an atypical way, and the thing it does is a thing that AI is actually pretty decent at (summarizing text)? Sounds like they couldn’t stop themselves from joining the dick hammering bandwagon, but decided not to hit it too hard.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          entirely optional

          No, it’s on by default, it has access to everything you’re browsing and doing fuck knows what with it, and you need to know that it is doing it and unless you’ve read it somewhere you don’t know that it’s there.

          thing that AI is actually pretty decent at (summarizing text)

          That’s so not true it’s not even funny.

          I mean yeah, it could be worse, everything could be worse. Still, not good, not good at all.

        • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          *yet

          The new CEO is an AI True Believer, and I don’t doubt this will last.

          They’ll remove the options to turn it off, and make it full of the AI features, with no opt-out or opt-in

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          This isn’t my wheelhouse so take it with a grain of salt, but an argument against link summarizers that I’ve heard is that it takes views away from websites that could be generating revenue for themselves. Instead an LLM scraped their content and fed a summary directly to the user.

          • quantumcrop@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s more of a concern with google summaries that show up at the top of search results because it completely removes the need to click on any of the websites it pulls from. Ideally a link summary just lets you figure out which link you need without clicking on and looking at each one.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Thanks for adding that detail, makes sense. I was thinking the link previews were yeah more like the google results. Hover over and not have to go to the site.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Do people making that argument also find ad blockers even ten percent as horrible as this? They both ultimately have the same effect, which is your web browser not maximizing someone else’s profits by denying them a revenue opportunity.

            I’d be curious if the link summarizer in Firefox runs a model locally or calls some remote API. Most current machines ought to be able to run an appropriate LLM model for that task.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s a good question. I’d personally argue that it’s different in that the adblockers are not an inbuilt part of Firefox, they’re made by extension developers. This is built right into the browser.

        • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          you only encounter it by interacting with the browser in an atypical way

          Leaving my pointer on a random place that happens to be a link is atypical? I don’t think it is. I had this pop up to me a couple of days ago and I didn’t even understand what could’ve triggered it, I was wondering if I clicked something or pressed a key unconsciously.

          and the thing it does is a thing that AI is actually pretty decent at (summarizing text)

          Pretty decent? Just passable, if the text is about some run-of-the-mill topic.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Doesn’t do that for me. I have to hold left click on a link for over a second to trigger it.

            And yeah, pretty decent. It can produce a basically summary of a fair amount of text pretty quickly and generally accurately. It’s not an expert wordsmith, it won’t give a deep and thoughtful analysis of the poem you pointed it at or anything, but that’s not the use case. The use case is “give me the key bullet points of this article so I can decide if I should give it more attention.”, and it does that job pretty well.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              generally accurately

              This is absolutely, demonstrably, documentedly not true. It is accurate sometimes, and sometimes it shows you absolute bullshit. When will it be accurate? Who knows. So you can use it only when you don’t care about the truth, in which case why even bother, just imagine the article said what you wanted it to say and be done with it

        • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Holding my click on a volume slider triggered the feature so it quickly became really annoying

        • Porco@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Installed Firefox from the Mint repos. It does.*

          *Source: Me, just tried it.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Well, mine doesn’t. I’m not going to search how to enable it. I will just keep using the best browser there is and donating to Servo.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      The article does say that we should always be able to turn off the AI part.

    • Glifted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Looks nice but how’s the ad blocking performance? I’m currently using Librewolf with ublock origin and a pi-hole and I basically never see ads anymore

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        you’ll have about the same experience with zen+ublock, all told. obviously there’s more advanced privacy features you’ll lose, but your advertising experience will be about the same, nearly if not identical

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I just use uBlock Origin with Zen and I never see ads. Not sure if it works on Youtube or any other streaming sites as I do not use any of them.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Since the comment you were responding to was edited to strike out “Ladybird” and write “Servo” instead, would you mind editing your comment to clarify you are talking about Ladybird and not Servo?

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Holy hell. I knew about the gender neutral pronouns debacle. Didn’t know there are more…

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        50
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Are we supposed to only use products and services from people whom we agree with completely on their full set of personal beliefs?

        • Luci@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But on Lemmy I can block the devs and all of .ml

          That’s user choice baby

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            There is the part where moderation tools seem almost intentionally left out. This place is almost as open to manipulation as 4chan.

            Remember when 4chan used to be progressive, libertarian, (uh, and racist)?

            • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Rememver when 4chan used to be progressive

              If it ever was, it had to have happened sometime in the middle of its existence, cuz it sure as hell wasn’t that when it launched and sure as hell isn’t that now.

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                It was before and during the time of “Anonymous the Hacker known as 4chan”.

                And yeah, my point was that it was easy to manipulate into being a far-right Nazi hellhole, instead of, you know, a more progressive (but still racist) and libertarian hellhole.

              • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Kind of was progressive, issue is that Moot thought it was a good idea to give the nazis their own place, where they begun radicalizing each other, and even planned harassment campaigns.

                And even then, a lot of “4chan progressives” only learned the concept of harassment campaigns, which they turned into what many call “cancel culture”. I’m not saying that all callouts are bad, but often people don’t want to resolve it in private, the “resolve it in private” for the callouter means the other ceases all online presence after a dox threat in private, or at worst it’s being used to get rid of an annoying creator they hated. Often all with the old 4chan-style “you can lie a little bit or more as long as you manage to control the narrative” mentality. Not to mention that the right figured out they can manipulate leftists into toxic callout campaigns.

                Also if you ever seen a person saying “why don’t we give a shitton of antidepressants for gender dysphoria instead of hormones?”, that was either a former 4chan progressive, or was influenced by one, since a lot of people who became “mental health positive” due to Project Chanology usually did in a very performative opposition to Scientology’s anti-psychiatry.

            • Luci@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I’m actually not sure what you’re trying to say tbh. Sorry I’m dumb.

        • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          One of the reasons I switched to a PieFed server. I’ve been happy with the switch though, it feels generally smoother in my browser as well. That’s the beauty of the Fediverse. Even on a whole different platform, I’m still able to participate in this discussion hosted on a Lemmy server.

        • coolman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          What are you talking about? Any links?

          I’m not disagreeing, I just haven’t heard this about Lemmy yet

          • cowfodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            .ml is a tankie instance. The main Lemmy dev is an admin on there, and is definitely a tankie.

              • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                Eh, it’s more complicated, it’s a Haitian revolutionary and the first emperor of Haiti post-revolution. (Functionally a dictatorship)

                He killed most of the remaining colonists, enforced plantation labor, and was overthrown after like 2-3 years, but a lot of haiti now remembers him mostly for abolishing slavery and there’s a lot of revisionism or justification for his worse acts.

                So like its hard to know what someone who likes him knows / thinks about him.

                • MotoAsh@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  “abolished slavery”, “enforced plantation labor”

                  uh… this really sounds like one of those “pick one” moments.

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Just disable the feature or use one of the great Firefox forks like Librewolf or Waterfox. Maybe even Iceweasel.

  • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I hope enough people remain on this AI infested ghost ship that it can keep providing a base for librewolf.